Paper detail

A Comprehensive Study of an Online Packet Scheduling Algorithm

We study the \emph{bounded-delay model} for Qualify-of-Service buffer management. Time is discrete. There is a buffer. Unit-length jobs (also called \emph{packets}) arrive at the buffer over time. Each packet has an integer release time, an integer deadline, and a positive real value. A packet's characteristics are not known to an online algorithm until the packet actually arrives. In each time step, at most one packet can be sent out of the buffer. The objective is to maximize the total value of the packets sent by their respective deadlines in an online manner. An online algorithm's performance is usually measured in terms of \emph{competitive ratio}, when this online algorithm is compared with a clairvoyant algorithm achieving the best total value. In this paper, we study a simple and intuitive online algorithm. We analyze its performance in terms of competitive ratio for the general model and a few important variants.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.