Paper detail

A comprehensive progenitor model for SNe Ia

Incorporating the effect of mass-stripping and accretion-disk instability on the evolution of WD binary, we carried out binary stellar evolution calculations for more than 1600 close WD binaries. As a result, the initial parameter spaces for SNe Ia are presented in an orbital period-secondary mass ($\log P_{\rm i}, M_{\rm 2}^{\rm i}$) plane. We confirmed that in a WD + MS system, the initial companion leading to SNe Ia may have mass from 1 $M_{\odot}$ to 5 $M_{\odot}$. The initial WD mass for SNe Ia from WD + MS channel is as low as 0.565 $M_{\odot}$, while the lowest WD mass from the WD + RG channel is 1.0 $M_{\odot}$. Adopting the results above, we studied the birth rate of SNe Ia via a binary population synthesis approach. We found that the Galactic SNe Ia birth rate from SD model is $2.55 - 2.9\times10^{\rm -3}$ ${\rm yr}^{\rm -1}$ (including WD + He star channel), which is slightly smaller than that from observation. If a single starburst is assumed, the distribution of the delay time of SNe Ia from the SD model is a weak bimodality, where WD + He channel contribute to SNe Ia with delay time shorter than $10^{\rm 8}$ yr and WD + RG channel to those with age longer than 6 Gyr.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.