Paper detail

A Comprehensive Empirical Study of Vision-Language Pre-trained Model for Supervised Cross-Modal Retrieval

Cross-Modal Retrieval (CMR) is an important research topic across multimodal computing and information retrieval, which takes one type of data as the query to retrieve relevant data of another type. It has been widely used in many real-world applications. Recently, the vision-language pre-trained models represented by CLIP demonstrate its superiority in learning the visual and textual representations and gain impressive performance on various vision and language related tasks. Although CLIP as well as the previous pre-trained models have shown great performance improvement in the unsupervised CMR, the performance and impact of these pre-trained models on the supervised CMR were rarely explored due to the lack of common representation for the multimodal class-level associations. In this paper, we take CLIP as the current representative vision-language pre-trained model to conduct a comprehensive empirical study. We evaluate its performance and impact on the supervised CMR, and attempt to answer several key research questions. To this end, we first propose a novel model CLIP4CMR (CLIP enhanced network for Cross-Modal Retrieval) that employs the pre-trained CLIP as backbone network to perform the supervised CMR. Then by means of the CLIP4CMR framework, we revisit the design of different learning objectives in current CMR methods to provide new insights on model design. Moreover, we investigate the most concerned aspects in applying CMR, including the robustness to modality imbalance and sensitivity to hyper-parameters, to provide new perspectives for practical applications. Through extensive experiments, we show that CLIP4CMR achieves the SOTA results with prominent improvements on the benchmark datasets, and can be used as a fundamental framework to empirically study the key research issues of the supervised CMR, with significant implications for model design and practical considerations.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.