Paper detail

A comprehensive analysis using 9 dark matter halo models on the spiral galaxy NGC 4321

This paper addressed the dark matter analysis on the spiral galaxy NGC 4321 (M100) by considering the nine different dark matter profiles so far lacking in the scientific literature, i.e. Pseudoisothermal, Burkert, NFW, Moore, Einasto, core-modified, DC14, coreNFW and Lucky13 profiles. In this paper, we analyzed the rotation curve analysis on the galaxy NGC 4321 by using nonlinear fitting of star, gaseous and dark matter halo equations with selected VLA HI observation data. Among the nine dark matter profiles, four dark matter profiles (DC14, Lucky13, Burkert and Moore profiles) showed declining features and hence found to be not suitable for this galaxy. This is concluded to be mainly due to the characteristics of those dark matter profiles and also due to the varying levels of problems within the inner regions fittings. For the remaining five accepted dark matter profiles, we further conducted analysis by using the reduced chi-square test. Four out of the five accepted dark matter profiles lie within the range of 0.40 < reduced chi-square < 1.70, except for the case of the core-modified profile. In addition, Pseudoisothermal profile achieved the best fitting i.e. reduced chi-square nearest to 1, mainly due to its linearity in the inner region and flatness at large radii.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.