Paper detail

A comprehensive analysis of NGC 2158 in Gaia era: photometric parameters, apex and orbit

We present an investigation of NGC 2158 using Gaia-DR2 data. We identified 800 most likely cluster members with membership probability higher than 90%. The mean proper motions of this object are determined as (mu_{x}=-0.203 \pm 0.003, mu_{y}=-1.99 \pm 0.004) mas yr^{-1}. The limiting radius, log(age), and distance of the cluster are obtained as 23.5 arcmin, 9.38 \pm 0.04 Gyr and 4.69 \pm 0.22 kpc, respectively. The overall mass function slope (0.93 \pm 0.14) is flatter than the Salpeter value (1.35) within the mass range 1.17-1.44 M_\odot. This cluster also shows the mass-segregation effect and our study demonstrates that NGC 2158 is a dynamically relaxed open cluster. Using the AD-diagram, the apex coordinates of the cluster are obtained in different ways and examined using (μ_{U},μ_{T}) diagram. The best value of apex coordinates is determined as A=87.24^\circ \pm 1.60^\circ, D=-36.61^\circ \pm 5.30 ^\circ. We also determined the orbit of the cluster and found that NGC 2158 moves almost in the Solar antapex direction. The resulting spatial velocity of NGC 2158 is 51 km s^{-1}. A significant oscillations along the Z-coordinate up to 529~pc is detected. Various scenarios regarding the origin of this cluster are also discussed.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access10 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.