Paper detail

A complete sample of 21-cm absorbers at z~1.3: Giant Metrewave Radio Telescope Survey Using MgII Systems

We present the results of a systematic Giant Metrewave Radio Telescope (GMRT) survey of 21-cm absorption in a representative and unbiased sample of 35 strong MgII systems in the redshift range: zabs~1.10-1.45, 33 of which have W_r>1 Å. The survey using ~400hrs of telescope time has resulted in 9 new 21-cm detections and stringent 21-cm optical depth upper limits (median 3-sigma optical depth per 10 km/s of 0.017) for the remaining 26 systems. This is by far the largest number of 21-cm detections from any single survey of intervening absorbers. Prior to our survey no intervening 21-cm system was known in the above redshift range and only one system was known in the redshift range 0.7<z<1.5. We discuss the relation between the detectability of 21-cm absorption and various properties of UV absorption lines. We show that if MgII systems are selected with the following criteria, MgII doublet ratio <1.3 and W_r(MgI)/W_r(MgII)>0.3, then a detection rate of 21-cm absorption up to 90% can be achieved. We estimate n_{21}, the number per unit redshift of 21-cm absorbers with W_r(Mg(II)>W_o and integrated optical depth Tau_{21}>Tau_o and show that n_{21} decreases with increasing redshift. In particular, for W_o=1.0 Åand Tau_o>0.3 km\s, n_{21} falls by a factor 4 from <z>=0.5 to <z>=1.3. The evolution seems to be stronger for stronger MgII systems. Using a subsample of systems for which high frequency VLBA images are available, we show that the effect is not related to the structure of the background radio sources and is most probably due to the evolution of the cold neutral medium filling factor in MgII systems. We find no correlation between the velocity spread of the 21-cm absorption feature and W_r(MgII) at z~1.3.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.