Abstract

We present a survey of MgII absorbing gas in the vicinity of 380 random galaxies, using 156 background quasi-stellar objects(QSOs) as absorption-line probes. The sample comprises 211 isolated (73 quiescent and 138 star-forming galaxies) and 43 non-isolated galaxies with sensitive constraints for both MgII absorption and Ha emission. The projected distances span a range from d=9 to 497 kpc, redshifts of the galaxies range from z=0.10 to 0.48, and rest-frame absolute B-band magnitudes range from MB=−16.7M_{\rm B}=-16.7 to −22.8-22.8. Our analysis shows that the rest-frame equivalent width of MgII, WrW_r(2796), depends on halo radius(RhR_h), BB-band luminosity(LBL_{\rm B}) and stellar mass (MstarM_{\rm star}) of the host galaxies, and declines steeply with increasing dd for isolated, star-forming galaxies. WrW_r(2796) exhibits no clear trend for either isolated, quiescent galaxies or non-isolated galaxies. The covering fraction of MgII absorbing gas ⟨κ⟩\langle κ\rangle is high with ⟨κ⟩≳60\langle κ\rangle\gtrsim 60% at <40<40 kpc for isolated galaxies and declines rapidly to ⟨κ⟩≈0\langle κ\rangle\approx 0 at d≳100d\gtrsim100 kpc. Within the gaseous radius, ⟨κ⟩\langle κ\rangle depends sensitively on both MstarM_{\rm star} and the specific star formation rate inferred from Ha. Different from massive quiescent halos, the observed velocity dispersion of MgII gas around star-forming galaxies is consistent with expectations from virial motion, which constrains individual clump mass to mcl≳105 M⊙m_{\rm cl} \gtrsim 10^5 \,\rm M_\odot and cool gas accretion rate of ∼0.7−2 M⊙ yr−1\sim 0.7-2 \,M_\odot\,\rm yr^{-1}. We find no strong azimuthal dependence of MgII absorption for either star-forming or quiescent galaxies. Our results highlight the need of a homogeneous, absorption-blind sample for establishing a holistic description of chemically-enriched gas in the circumgalactic space.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.