Paper detail

A Comparison Study of the Detection Limit of Omicron SARS-CoV-2 Nucleocapsid by various Rapid Antigen Tests

Since the first case of COVID-19 disease in Wuhan in December 2019, there is a worldwide struggle to reduce the transmission of acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus SARS-CoV-2. Many countries worldwide decided to impose local lockdowns in order to reduce person-to-person interactions, masks became obligatory especially in closed spaces, and there was a general requirement for social distance. However, the most efficient method to reduce continuing spreading of infection among the population, and in the meantime maintain a regular daily life, is early detection of infected contagious people. Up to now, the most reliable method for SARS-CoV-2 detection is reverse-transcriptase PCR test (RT-PCR). It is possible to detect the virus even if there is only one RNA strand in the sample, and run hundreds of samples simultaneously. This method has a few disadvantages, such as high cost, is time consuming, the need for medical laboratories and skilled staff to perform the test, and the major flaw: the lack of appropriate number of available tests. The latterly prominent Omicron variant (B.1.1.529) and its derivatives have caused a tremendous increase in the number of infected people due to its enhanced transmissibility. This all emphasizes the high demand for easy-to-use, cheap and available detection tests.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.