Paper detail

A comparison of X-ray photon indices among the narrow and broad-line Seyfert 1 galaxies

We present a detailed comparative systematic study using a sample of 221 Narrow-line Seyfert 1 (NLSy1) galaxies in comparison to a redshift matched sample of 154 Broad-line Seyfert 1 (BLSy1) galaxies based on their observations using ROSAT and/or XMM-Newton telescopes in soft X-ray band (0.1-2.0 keV). A homogeneous analysis is carried out to estimate their soft X-ray photon indices ($Γ^{s}_{X}$) and its correlations with other parameters of nuclear activities such as Eddington ratios (R$_\mathrm{Edd}$), bolometric luminosities (L$_\mathrm{bol}$), black hole masses (M$_\mathrm{BH}$) and the widths of the broad component of H$β$ lines (FWHM(H$β$)). In our analysis, we found clear evidence of the difference in the $Γ^{s}_{X}$ and R$_\mathrm{Edd}$ distributions among NLSy1 and BLSy1 galaxies, with steeper $Γ^{s}_{X}$ and higher R$_\mathrm{Edd}$ for the former. Such a difference also exists in the spectral indices distribution in hard X-ray ($Γ^{h}_{X}$), based on the analysis of 53 NLSy1 and 46 BLSy1 galaxies in the 2-10 keV energy band. The difference in R$_\mathrm{Edd}$ distributions does exist even after applying the average correction for the difference in the inclination angle of NLSy1 and BLSy1 galaxies. We also estimated R$_\mathrm{Edd}$, based on SED fitting of 34 NLSy1 and 30 BLSy1 galaxies over the 0.3-10 keV energy band and found that results are still consistent with R$_\mathrm{Edd}$ estimates based on the optical bolometric luminosity. Our analysis suggests that the higher R$_\mathrm{Edd}$ in NLSy1 is responsible for its steeper X-ray spectral slope compared to the BLSy1, consistent with the disc-corona model as proposed for the luminous AGNs.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.