Paper detail

A comparison of the performance and scalability of relational and document-based web-systems for large scale applications in a rehabilitation context

Background: The Virtual Rehabilitation Environment (VRE) provides patients of long term neurological conditions with a platform to review their previous physiotherapy sessions, as well as see their goals and any treatments or exercises that their clinician has set for them to practice before their next session. Objective: The initial application implemented 21 of the 27 core features using the Microsoft ASP.NET MVC stack. However, the two core, non-functional requirements were negated from the project due to lack of experience and strict time constraints. This project aimed to investigate whether the application would be more suited to a non-relational solution. Method: The application was re-written using the MEAN stack (MongoDB, ExpressJS, AngularJS, NodeJS), an open source, fully JavaScript stack and then performance tests were carried out to compare the two applications. A scalability review was also conducted to assess the benefits and drawbacks of each technology in this aspect. Results: The investigation proved that the non-relational solution was much more efficient and performed faster. However, the choice of database was only a small part of the increase in efficiency and it was an all-round better design that gave the new application its performance upper hand. Conclusion: A proposal for a new application design is given that follows the microservice architecture used by companies such as Amazon and Netflix. The application is to be split up into four parts; database, client application, server application and content delivery network. These four, independently scalable and manageable services offer the greatest flexibility for future development at the low costs necessary for a start-up.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.