Paper detail

A comparison of the evolution of the density field in perturbation theory and numerical simulations - II Counts in cells analysis

We present a detailed comparison of the predictions of perturbation theory for the averaged J-point correlation functions, $\xibar_J$, with the results of numerical simulations of gravitational clustering. We have carried out a systematic analysis of this method using ensembles of simulations with different numbers of particles, different box sizes and using different particle arrangements and clustering amplitudes in the initial conditions. We estimate $\xibar_J$, for $J=2-10$, from moments of counts-in-cells. We find significant non-linear effects in the variance, $J=2$, even at scales as large as $R \sim 30 \Mpc$. Perturbation theory gives remarkable agreement at large scales, where $\xibar_2 \simlt 1$, with the measured hierarchical amplitudes $S_J=\xibar_J/\xibar_2^{J-1}$. We have followed the evolution of $\xibar_J$ in time and find that for a change in the effective redshift of at least $Δz \simeq 2$ the amplitudes $S_J$ remain unchanged, despite the fact that the $\xibar_J$ have evolved by large factors, $\simeq 10^{J-1}$. We illustrate how these results can be applied to interpret the clustering in galaxy surveys and conclude that the observed hierarchical pattern in the APM is compatible with gravitational evolution in unbiased, initially Gaussian, models.

preprint1994arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.