Paper detail

A comparison of syntheses approaches towards functional polycrystalline silicate ceramics

This study aims to shed light on processing pathways towards functional silicate ceramics, which show some promise in various emerging applications, including dielectrics and bioactive implant materials. Polycrystalline silicate ceramics of Neso, Soro and Inosilicate families were synthesised by three different techniques: (i) a co-precipitation method, (ii) a modified sol-gel method and (iii) standard solid-state reactions. Co-precipitated samples show increased sintering and densification behaviour compared to sol-gel and solid-state methods, with diametral shrinkage values during sintering of 28.8%, 13.3% and 25.0%, respectively. Well-controlled phase formation in these ceramics was most readily achieved through the steric entrapment of cations and shorter diffusion pathways afforded by the modified Pechini-type sol-gel method. Substituting Zn2+ for Mg2+ in enstatite samples was found to enhance the formation of orthoenstatite during cooling, which is otherwise very slow. We present guidelines for the design of synthesis methods that consider the requirements for different functional silicate ceramics in terms of phase formation and microstructure.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.