Paper detail

A comparison of hard X-ray photon indices and iron \ka emission lines in X-ray luminous narrow- and broad-line Seyfert 1 galaxies

We use publicly available XMM-Newton data to systematically compare the hard X-ray photon indices, $Γ_{\rm 2-10\ keV}$ and the iron K$α$ emission lines of narrow-line (NL) and broad-line Seyfert 1 (BLS1) galaxies. We compile a flux-limited ($f_{\rm 2-10\ keV} \geq 1 \times 10^{-12}$ erg s$^{-1}$ cm$^{-2}$) sample including 114 radio-quiet objects, with the 2-10 keV luminosity ranging from 10$^{41}$ to 10$^{45}$ erg s$^{-1}$. Our main results are: 1) NLS1s and BLS1s show similar luminosity distributions; 2) The weighted mean of $Γ_{\rm 2-10\ keV}$ of NLS1s, BLS1s and the total sample is $2.04\pm0.04$, $1.74\pm0.02$, $1.84\pm0.02$, respectively; a significant anti-correlation between \ga and FWHMH$β$ suggests that $Γ_{\rm 2-10\ keV} > 2.0$ may be taken to indicate X-ray luminous NLS1 type; 3) The 6.4 keV narrow iron K$α$ lines from NLS1s are generally weaker than that from BLS1s; this would indicate a smaller covering factor of the dusty tori in NLS1s, if the line emission originates from the inner boundary region of the dusty torus in an AGN; 4) all the broadened iron K$α$ lines with intrinsic width $σ>0.5$ keV correspond to FWHM\hb $\leq 4000 ~\kms$.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.