Paper detail

A comparison of handcrafted, parameterized, and learnable features for speech separation

The design of acoustic features is important for speech separation. It can be roughly categorized into three classes: handcrafted, parameterized, and learnable features. Among them, learnable features, which are trained with separation networks jointly in an end-to-end fashion, become a new trend of modern speech separation research, e.g. convolutional time domain audio separation network (Conv-Tasnet), while handcrafted and parameterized features are also shown competitive in very recent studies. However, a systematic comparison across the three kinds of acoustic features has not been conducted yet. In this paper, we compare them in the framework of Conv-Tasnet by setting its encoder and decoder with different acoustic features. We also generalize the handcrafted multi-phase gammatone filterbank (MPGTF) to a new parameterized multi-phase gammatone filterbank (ParaMPGTF). Experimental results on the WSJ0-2mix corpus show that (i) if the decoder is learnable, then setting the encoder to STFT, MPGTF, ParaMPGTF, and learnable features lead to similar performance; and (ii) when the pseudo-inverse transforms of STFT, MPGTF, and ParaMPGTF are used as the decoders, the proposed ParaMPGTF performs better than the other two handcrafted features.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.