Paper detail

A comparison of frequentist and Bayesian inference: Searching for low-frequency p modes and g modes in Sun-as-a-star data

We describe and use two different statistical approaches to try and detect low-frequency solar oscillations in Sun-as-a-star data: a frequentist approach and a Bayesian approach. We have used frequentist statistics to search contemporaneous Sun-as-a-star data for coincident, statistically-prominent features. However, we find that this approach leads to numerous false detections. We have also used Bayesian statistics to search for evidence of low-frequency p modes and g modes in Sun-as-a-star data. We describe how Bayesian statistics can be used to search near-contemporaneous data for coincident prominent features. Near-contemporaneous data were used to circumvent the difficulties in deriving probabilities that occur when common noise is present in the data. We find that the Bayesian approach, which is reliant on the assumptions made when determining the posterior probability, leads to significantly fewer false detections and those that are observed can be discredited using a priori knowledge. Therefore, we have more confidence in the mode candidates found with Bayesian statistics.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.