Paper detail

A comparison of duality and energy aposteriori estimates for L?(0,T;L2(Ω)) in parabolic problems

We use the elliptic reconstruction technique in combination with a duality approach to prove aposteriori error estimates for fully discrete back- ward Euler scheme for linear parabolic equations. As an application, we com- bine our result with the residual based estimators from the aposteriori esti- mation for elliptic problems to derive space-error indicators and thus a fully practical version of the estimators bounding the error in the L \infty (0, T ; L2(Ω)) norm. These estimators, which are of optimal order, extend those introduced by Eriksson and Johnson (1991) by taking into account the error induced by the mesh changes and allowing for a more flexible use of the elliptic estima- tors. For comparison with previous results we derive also an energy-based aposteriori estimate for the L \infty (0, T ; L2(Ω))-error which simplifies a previous one given in Lakkis and Makridakis (2006). We then compare both estimators (duality vs. energy) in practical situations and draw conclusions.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.