Paper detail

A Comparison and Unification of Ellipsoidal Statistical and Shakhov BGK Models

The Ellipsoidal Statistical model (ES-model) and the Shakhov model (S-model) are constructed for the correction of Prandtl number of the original BGK model through the modification of stress and heat flux. Even though in the continuum flow regime, both models can give the same Navier-Stokes equations with correct Prandtl number, their modification of the collision term may have different dynamic effect in the non-equilibrium transition flow regimes. With the introduction of one free parameter, a generalized kinetic model with the combination of the ES-model and S-model can be developed, and this new model can get the correct Navier-Stokes equations in the continuum flow regime as well, but with abundant dynamic effect through the adjustment of the new degree of freedom. In order to validate the generalized model, a numerical method based on the unified gas kinetic scheme (UGKS) has been developed for the new model. The physical performance of the new model with the variation of the free parameter has been tested, where the ES-model and S-model become the limiting cases. In transition flow regime, many physical problems, i.e., the shock structure and micro-flows, have been studied using the generalized model. With a careful choice of the free parameter, good results can be achieved for most test cases. The overall conclusion is that the S-model predicts more accurate numerical solutions in most tough test cases presented in this paper than the ES-model, while ES-model performs better in the cases when the flow is mostly driven by heat, such as a channel flow with large boundary temperature variations at high Knudsen number. The numerical study demonstrates the necessity of developing such a generalized model. With the inclusion of one more freedom, in the transition regime the new kinetic model may provide more accurate solution than the ES and Shakhov models.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.