Paper detail

A comparative study of the behaviour of forsterite melts under atmospheric and sub-atmospheric conditions

The study is focussed towards understanding the difference in behaviour of forsterite droplets subjected to sub-atmospheric conditions. Melt droplets, 1.5-2.5 mm in diameter, are made to crystallize under levitated conditions. The spherule is initially superheated by about 250oC above its liquids temperature, for both atmospheric and sub-atmospheric conditions, and then, subsequently cooled at different cooling rates. Crystallization of molten droplets was observed from their hypercooled states in all the cases. It was found that the level of undercooling was more (~150K-200K) for sub-atmospheric cases. In addition, the degree of recalescence was also found to be higher. However, the varying cooling rates did not produce any considerable effect on the level of undercooling or, even, the degree of recalescence. For better insight into the dynamics of crystallization, in situ visualization of the recalescence process was made possible by use of high-speed camera. A clear difference in the growth mechanisms was observed. The role of cooling rate in affecting crystallization was seen as the difference in the growth of the crystal-front; from a clear rim front, in high cooling rates, to a faded irregularly shaped crystal front, in low cooling rates. Two proper crystal fronts were observed in all the cases, which correspond to surface and volumetric crystallizations. It was observed that the molten droplets, under sub-atmospheric conditions, undergo high rate of volumetric crystallization, which is marked by the sightings of surface textures during the recalescence process. High-speed camera images of recalescence provided direct observational proof of the delay in volumetric crystallization, compared to surface crystallization.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.