Paper detail

A comparative study of scalable multilevel preconditioners for cardiac mechanics

In this work, we provide a performance comparison between the Balancing Domain Decomposition by Constraints (BDDC) and the Algebraic Multigrid (AMG) preconditioners for cardiac mechanics on both structured and unstructured finite element meshes. The mechanical behavior of myocardium can be described by the equations of three-dimensional finite elasticity, which are discretized by finite elements in space and yield the solution of a large scale nonlinear algebraic system. This problem is solved by a Newton-Krylov method, where the solution of the Jacobian linear system is accelerated by BDDC/AMG preconditioners. We thoroughly explore the main parameters of the BDDC preconditioner in order to make the comparison fair. We focus on: the performance of different direct solvers for the local and coarse problems of the BDDC algorithm; the impact of the different choices of BDDC primal degrees of freedom; and the influence of the finite element degree. Scalability tests are performed on Linux clusters up to 1024 processors, and we conclude with a performance study on a realistic electromechanical simulation.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.