Paper detail

A Comparative Study of Long and Short GRBs. I. Overlapping Properties

Gamma ray bursts (GRBs) are classified into long and short categories based on their durations. Broad band studies suggest that these two categories of objects roughly correspond to two different classes of progenitor systems, i.e. compact star mergers (Type I) vs. massive star core collapse (Type II). However, the duration criterion sometimes leads to mis-identification of the progenitor systems. We perform a comprehensive multi-wavelength comparative study between duration-defined long GRBs and short GRBs as well as the so-called "consensus" long GRBs and short GRBs (which are believed to be more closely related to the two types of progenitor systems). The parameters we study include two parts: the prompt emission properties including duration ($T_{90}$), spectral peak energy ($E_{\rm p}$), low energy photon index ($α$), isotropic $γ$-ray energy ($E_{\rm γ, iso}$), isotropic peak luminosity ($L_{\rm p,iso}$), and the amplitude parameters ($f$ and $f_{\rm eff}$); and the host galaxy properties including stellar mass ($M_*$), star formation rate (SFR), metallicity ([X/H]), half light radius ($R_{50}$), angular and physical ($R_{\rm off}$) offset of the afterglow from the center of the host galaxy, the normalized offset ($r_{\rm off}=R_{\rm off}/R_{50}$), and the brightness fraction $F_{\rm light}$. For most parameters, we find interesting overlapping properties between the two populations in both 1D and 2D distribution plots. The three best parameters for the classification purpose are $T_{90}$, $f_{\rm eff}$, and $F_{\rm light}$. However, no single parameter alone is good enough to place a particular burst into the right physical category, suggesting a need of multiple criteria for physical classification.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.