Paper detail

A Comparative Analysis To Deal With Missing Spectral Information Caused By RFI In Cosmological HI 21CM Observations

We investigate the effect of radio-frequency interference (RFI) excision in estimating the cosmological \hi\ 21 cm power spectrum. Flagging of RFI-contaminated channels results in a non-uniform sampling of the instrumental bandpass response. Hence, the Fourier transformation (FT) of visibilities from frequency to delay domain contaminates the higher foreground-free delay modes, and separating the spectrally fluctuating \hi\ signal from spectrally smooth foregrounds becomes challenging. We have done a comparative analysis between two algorithms, one-dimensional CLEAN and Least Square Spectral Analysis (LSSA), which have been used widely to solve this issue in the literature. We test these algorithms using the simulated SKA-1 low observations in the presence of different RFI flagging scenarios. We find that in the presence of random flagging of data, both algorithms perform well and can mitigate the foreground leakage issue. But, CLEAN fails to restrict the foreground leakage in the presence of periodic and periodic plus broadband RFI flagging and gives an extra bias to the estimated power spectrum. However, LSSA can restrict the foreground leakage for these RFI flagging scenarios and gives an unbiased estimate of the \hi\ 21 cm power spectrum. We have also applied these algorithms to the upgraded GMRT observation and found that both CLEAN and LSSA give consistent results in the presence of realistic random flagging scenarios for this observed data set. This comparative analysis demonstrates the effectiveness and robustness of these two algorithms in estimating the \hi\ 21 cm power spectrum from the data set affected by different RFI scenarios.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.