Paper detail

A comparative analysis of standard accretion disks spectra: an application to Ultraluminous X-ray Sources

We compare standard models of accretion disks around black holes that include the appropriate zero-torque inner boundary condition and relativistic effects on the emission and propagation of radiation. The comparison is performed adopting the multicolor disk blackbody model (MCD) as reference and looking for the parameter space in which it is in statistical agreement with "more physical" accretion disk models. We find simple 'recipes' that can be used for adjusting the estimates of the physical inner radius of the disk, the black hole mass and the accretion rate inferred using the parameters of the MCD fits. We applied these results to four ULXs for which MCD spectral fits of their X-ray soft spectral components have been published and find that, in three cases (NGC 1313 X-1, X-2 and M 81 X-9), the black hole masses inferred for a standard disk around a Schwarzschild black hole are in the interval ~100-200 solar masses. Only if the black hole is maximally rotating are the masses comparable to the much larger values previously derived in the literature.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.