Paper detail

A Common Origin of Neutralino Stars and Supermassive Black Holes

To account for the microlensing events observed in the Galactic halo, Gurevich, Zybin, and Sirota have proposed a model of gravitationally bound, noncompact objects with masses of 0.01-1M_\odot. These objects are formed in the expanding Universe from adiabatic density perturbations and consist of weakly interacting particles of dark matter, for example, neutralinos. They assumed the perturbation spectrum on some small scale to have a distinct peak. We show that the existence of this peak would inevitably give rise to a large number of primordial black holes (PBHs) with masses of \sim10^5M_\odot at the radiation-dominated evolutionary stage of the Universe. Constraints on the coefficient of nonlinear contraction and on the compactness parameter of noncompact objects were derived from constraints on the PBH number density. We show that noncompact objects can serve as gravitational lenses only at a large PBH formation threshold, δ_c > 0.5, or if noncompact objects are formed from entropic density perturbations.

preprint2002arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.