Paper detail

A Common Gene Expression Signature Analysis Method for Multiple Types of Cancer

Mining gene expression profiles has proven valuable for identifying signatures serving as surrogates of cancer phenotypes. However, the similarities of such signatures across different cancer types have not been strong enough to conclude that they represent a universal biological mechanism shared among multiple cancer types. Here we describe a network-based approach that explores gene-to-gene connections in multiple cancer datasets while maximizing the overall association of the subnetwork with clinical outcomes. With the dataset of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), we studied the characteristics of common gene expression of three types of cancers: Rectum adenocarcinoma (READ), Breast invasive carcinoma (BRCA) and Colon adenocarcinoma (COAD). By analyzing several pairs of highly correlated genes after filtering and clustering work, we found that the co-expressed genes across multiple types of cancers point to particular biological mechanisms related to cancer cell progression , suggesting that they represent important attributes of cancer in need of being elucidated for potential applications in diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic products applicable to multiple cancer types.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.