Paper detail

A Combinatorial $\tilde{O}(m^{3/2})$-time Algorithm for the Min-Cost Flow Problem

We present a combinatorial method for the min-cost flow problem and prove that its expected running time is bounded by $\tilde O(m^{3/2})$. This matches the best known bounds, which previously have only been achieved by numerical algorithms or for special cases. Our contribution contains three parts that might be interesting in their own right: (1) We provide a construction of an equivalent auxiliary network and interior primal and dual points with potential $P_0=\tilde{O}(\sqrt{m})$ in linear time. (2) We present a combinatorial potential reduction algorithm that transforms initial solutions of potential $P_0$ to ones with duality gap below $1$ in $\tilde O(P_0\cdot \mbox{CEF}(n,m,ε))$ time, where $ε^{-1}=O(m^2)$ and $\mbox{CEF}(n,m,ε)$ denotes the running time of any combinatorial algorithm that computes an $ε$-approximate electrical flow. (3) We show that solutions with duality gap less than $1$ suffice to compute optimal integral potentials in $O(m+n\log n)$ time with our novel crossover procedure. All in all, using a variant of a state-of-the-art $ε$-electrical flow solver, we obtain an algorithm for the min-cost flow problem running in $\tilde O(m^{3/2})$.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.