Paper detail

A Combinatorial Approximation Algorithm for Graph Balancing with Light Hyper Edges

Makespan minimization in restricted assignment $(R|p_{ij}\in \{p_j, \infty\}|C_{\max})$ is a classical problem in the field of machine scheduling. In a landmark paper in 1990 [8], Lenstra, Shmoys, and Tardos gave a 2-approximation algorithm and proved that the problem cannot be approximated within 1.5 unless P=NP. The upper and lower bounds of the problem have been essentially unimproved in the intervening 25 years, despite several remarkable successful attempts in some special cases of the problem [2,4,12] recently. In this paper, we consider a special case called graph-balancing with light hyper edges, where heavy jobs can be assigned to at most two machines while light jobs can be assigned to any number of machines. For this case, we present algorithms with approximation ratios strictly better than 2. Specifically, Two job sizes: Suppose that light jobs have weight $w$ and heavy jobs have weight $W$, and $w < W$. We give a $1.5$-approximation algorithm (note that the current 1.5 lower bound is established in an even more restrictive setting [1,3]). Indeed, depending on the specific values of $w$ and $W$, sometimes our algorithm guarantees sub-1.5 approximation ratios. Arbitrary job sizes: Suppose that $W$ is the largest given weight, heavy jobs have weights in the range of $(βW, W]$, where $4/7\leq β< 1$, and light jobs have weights in the range of $(0,βW]$. We present a $(5/3+β/3)$-approximation algorithm. Our algorithms are purely combinatorial, without the need of solving a linear program as required in most other known approaches.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.