Paper detail

A combinatorial analysis of Severi degrees

Based on results by Brugallé and Mikhalkin, Fomin and Mikhalkin give formulas for computing classical Severi degrees $N^{d, δ}$ using long-edge graphs. In 2012, Block, Colley and Kennedy considered the logarithmic version of a special function associated to long-edge graphs appeared in Fomin-Mikhalkin's formula, and conjectured it to be linear. They have since proved their conjecture. At the same time, motivated by their conjecture, we consider a special multivariate function associated to long-edge graphs that generalizes their function. The main result of this paper is that the multivariate function we define is always linear. A special case of our result gives an independent proof of Block-Colley-Kennedy's conjecture. The first application of our linearity result is that by applying it to classical Severi degrees, we recover quadraticity of $Q^{d, δ}$ and a bound $δ$ for the threshold of polynomiality of $N^{d, δ}.$ Next, in joint work with Osserman, we apply the linearity result to a special family of toric surfaces and obtain universal polynomial results having connections to the Göttsche-Yau-Zaslow formula. As a result, we provide combinatorial formulas for the two unidentified power series $B_1(q)$ and $B_2(q)$ appearing in the Göttsche-Yau-Zaslow formula. The proof of our linearity result is completely combinatorial. We define $τ$-graphs which generalize long-edge graphs, and a closely related family of combinatorial objects we call $(τ, n)$-words. By introducing height functions and a concept of irreducibility, we describe ways to decompose certain families of $(τ, n)$-words into irreducible words, which leads to the desired results.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.