A clustering-based self-calibration of the richness-to-mass relation of CAMIRA galaxy clusters out to z≈1.1z\approx1.1 in the Hyper Suprime-Cam survey

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Abstract

We perform a self-calibration of the richness-to-mass (NN-MM) relation of CAMIRA galaxy clusters with richness N≥15N\geq15 at redshift 0.2≤z<1.10.2\leq z<1.1 by modeling redshift-space two-point correlation functions. These correlation functions are ξccξ_{\mathrm{cc}} of CAMIRA clusters, the auto-correlation function ξggξ_{\mathrm{gg}} of the CMASS galaxies spectroscopically observed in the BOSS survey, and the cross-correlation function ξcgξ_{\mathrm{cg}} between these two samples. We focus on constraining the normalization ANA_{\mathrm{N}} of the NN-MM relation in a forward-modeling approach, carefully accounting for the redshift-space distortion, the Finger-of-God effect, and the uncertainty in photometric redshifts of CAMIRA clusters. The modeling also takes into account the projection effect on the halo bias of CAMIRA clusters. The parameter constraints are shown to be unbiased according to validation tests using a large set of mock catalogs constructed from N-body simulations. At the pivotal mass M500=1014h−1M⊙M_{500}=10^{14}h^{-1}M_{\odot} and the pivotal redshift zpiv=0.6z_{\mathrm{piv}} = 0.6, the resulting normalization ANA_{\mathrm{N}} is constrained as 13.8−4.2+5.813.8^{+5.8}_{-4.2}, 13.2−2.7+3.413.2^{+3.4}_{-2.7}, and 11.9−1.9+3.011.9^{+3.0}_{-1.9} by modeling ξccξ_{\mathrm{cc}}, ξcc+ξcgξ_{\mathrm{cc}}+ξ_{\mathrm{cg}}, and ξcc+ξcg+ξggξ_{\mathrm{cc}} + ξ_{\mathrm{cg}} + ξ_{\mathrm{gg}}, with average uncertainties at levels of 36%36\%, 23%23\%, and 21%21\%, respectively. We find that the resulting ANA_{\mathrm{N}} is statistically consistent with those independently obtained from weak-lensing magnification and from a joint analysis of shear and cluster abundance, with a preference for a lower value at a level of ≲1.9σ\lesssim1.9σ. This implies that the absolute mass scale of CAMIRA clusters inferred from clustering is mildly higher than those from the independent methods. [abridged]

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.