Paper detail

A clustering-based self-calibration of the richness-to-mass relation of CAMIRA galaxy clusters out to $z\approx1.1$ in the Hyper Suprime-Cam survey

We perform a self-calibration of the richness-to-mass ($N$-$M$) relation of CAMIRA galaxy clusters with richness $N\geq15$ at redshift $0.2\leq z<1.1$ by modeling redshift-space two-point correlation functions. These correlation functions are $ξ_{\mathrm{cc}}$ of CAMIRA clusters, the auto-correlation function $ξ_{\mathrm{gg}}$ of the CMASS galaxies spectroscopically observed in the BOSS survey, and the cross-correlation function $ξ_{\mathrm{cg}}$ between these two samples. We focus on constraining the normalization $A_{\mathrm{N}}$ of the $N$-$M$ relation in a forward-modeling approach, carefully accounting for the redshift-space distortion, the Finger-of-God effect, and the uncertainty in photometric redshifts of CAMIRA clusters. The modeling also takes into account the projection effect on the halo bias of CAMIRA clusters. The parameter constraints are shown to be unbiased according to validation tests using a large set of mock catalogs constructed from N-body simulations. At the pivotal mass $M_{500}=10^{14}h^{-1}M_{\odot}$ and the pivotal redshift $z_{\mathrm{piv}} = 0.6$, the resulting normalization $A_{\mathrm{N}}$ is constrained as $13.8^{+5.8}_{-4.2}$, $13.2^{+3.4}_{-2.7}$, and $11.9^{+3.0}_{-1.9}$ by modeling $ξ_{\mathrm{cc}}$, $ξ_{\mathrm{cc}}+ξ_{\mathrm{cg}}$, and $ξ_{\mathrm{cc}} + ξ_{\mathrm{cg}} + ξ_{\mathrm{gg}}$, with average uncertainties at levels of $36\%$, $23\%$, and $21\%$, respectively. We find that the resulting $A_{\mathrm{N}}$ is statistically consistent with those independently obtained from weak-lensing magnification and from a joint analysis of shear and cluster abundance, with a preference for a lower value at a level of $\lesssim1.9σ$. This implies that the absolute mass scale of CAMIRA clusters inferred from clustering is mildly higher than those from the independent methods. [abridged]

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.