Paper detail

A cluster of many small holes with negative imaginary surface impedances may generate a negative refraction index

We deal with the scattering of an acoustic medium modeled by an index of refraction $n$ varying in a bounded region $Ω$ of $\mathbb{R}^3$ and equal to unity outside $Ω$. This region is perforated with an extremely large number of small holes $D_m$'s of maximum radius $a$, $a<<1$, modeled by surface impedance functions. Precisely, we are in the regime described by the number of holes of the order $M:=O(a^{β-2})$, the minimum distance between the holes is $d\sim a^t$ and the surface impedance functions of the form $λ_m \sim λ_{m,0} a^{-β}$ with $β>0$ and $λ_{m,0}$ being constants and eventually complex numbers. Under some natural conditions on the parameters $β, t$ and $λ_{m,0}$, we characterize the equivalent medium generating, approximately, the same scattered waves as the original perforated acoustic medium. We give an explicit error estimate between the scattered waves generated by the perforated medium and the equivalent one respectively, as $a \rightarrow 0$. As applications of these results, we discuss the following findings: 1. If we choose negative valued imaginary surface impedance functions, attached to each surface of the holes, then the equivalent medium behaves as a passive acoustic medium only if it is an acoustic metamaterial with index of refraction $\tilde{n}(x)=-n(x),\; x \in Ω$ and $\tilde{n}(x)=1,\; x \in \mathbb{R}^3\setminus{\overlineΩ}$. This means that, with this process, we can switch the sign of the index of the refraction from positive to negative values. 2. We can choose the surface impedance functions attached to each surface of the holes so that the equivalent index of refraction $\tilde{n}$ is $\tilde{n}(x)=1,\; x \in \mathbb{R}^3$. This means that the region $Ω$ modeled by the original index of refraction $n$ is approximately cloaked.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.