Paper detail

A Closer Look at the Fluctuations in Brightness of SN 2009ip During Its Late 2012 Eruption

The supernova impostor SN 2009ip has re-brightened several times since its initial discovery in August 2009. During its last outburst in late September 2012 it reached a peak brightness of m$_v$ $\sim$ 13.5 (M$_v$ brighter than -18) causing some to speculate that it had undergone a terminal core-collapse supernova. Relatively high-cadence multi-wavelength photometry of the post-peak decline revealed bumps in brightness infrequently observed in other Type IIn supernovae. These bumps occurred synchronously in all UV and optical bands with amplitudes of 0.1 -- 0.4 mag at intervals of 10 -- 30 days. Episodic continuum brightening and dimming in the UV and optical with these characteristics is not easilly explained within the context of models that have been proposed for the late September 2012 outburst of SN 2009ip. We also present evidence that the post peak fluctuations in brightness occur at regular intervals and raise more questions about their origin.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.