Paper detail

A closer look at CMB constraints on WIMP dark matter

We use Cosmic Microwave Background data from the WMAP, SPT, BICEP, and QUaD experiments to obtain constraints on the dark matter particle mass $m_χ$, and show that the combined data requires $m_χ> 7.6$ GeV at the 95% confidence level for the $χχ\rightarrow b \bar b$ channel assuming $s-$wave annihilation and a thermal cross section $<σ_{\rm a} v> = 3 \times 10^{-26}$ cm$^3/$s. We examine whether the bound on $m_χ$ is sensitive to $σ_8$ measurements made by galaxy cluster observations. The large uncertainty in $σ_8$ and the degeneracy with $Ω_{\rm m}$ allow only small improvements in the dark matter mass bound. Increasing the number of effective neutrino-like degrees of freedom to $N_{\rm eff} = 3.85$ improves the mass bound to $m_χ> 8.6$ GeV at 95% confidence, for the $χχ\rightarrow b \bar b$ channel. We also study models in which dark matter halos at $z<60$ reionize the Universe. We compute the Ostriker-Vishniac power resulting from partial reionization at intermediate redshifts $10<z<60$, but find the effect to be small. We discuss the importance of the large angle polarization as a complementary probe of dark matter annihilation. By performing Monte Carlo simulations, we show that future experiments that measure the $EE$ power spectrum from $20 < l < 50$ can exclude $m_χ\sim$ 10 GeV at the 2 (3) $σ$ level provided the error bars are smaller than 4 (3) $\times$ cosmic variance. We show that the Planck experiment will significantly improve our knowledge of dark matter properties.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.