Paper detail

A Clipping Method to Mitigate the Impact of Catastrophic Photometric Redshift Errors on Weak Lensing Tomography

We use the mock catalog of galaxies, constructed based on the COSMOS galaxy catalog including information on photometric redshifts (photo-z) and SED types of galaxies, in order to study how to define a galaxy subsample suitable for weak lensing tomography feasible with optical (and NIR) multi-band data. Since most of useful cosmological information arises from the sample variance limited regime for upcoming lensing surveys, a suitable subsample can be obtained by discarding a large fraction of galaxies that have less reliable photo-z estimations. We develop a method to efficiently identify photo-z outliers by monitoring the width of posterior likelihood function of redshift estimation for each galaxies. This clipping method may allow to obtain clean tomographic redshift bins (here three bins considered) that have almost no overlaps between different bins, by discarding more than 70% galaxies of ill-defined photo-z's corresponding to the number densities of remaining galaxies less than 20 per square arcminutes for a Subaru-type deep survey. Restricting the ranges of magnitudes and redshifts and/or adding near infrared data help obtain a cleaner redshift binning. By using the Fisher information matrix formalism, we propagate photo-z errors into biases in the dark energy equation of state parameter w. We found that, by discarding most of ill-defined photo-z galaxies, the bias in w can be reduced to the level comparable to the marginalized statistical error, however, the residual, small systematic bias remains due to asymmetric scatters around the relation between photometric and true redshifts. We also use the mock catalog to estimate the cumulative signal-to-noise (S/N) ratios for measuring the angular cross-correlations of galaxies between finner photo-z bins, finding the higher S/N values for photo-z bins including photo-z outliers.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.