Paper detail

A Classical Analogue to the Standard Model, Chapters 4-11: Particle generations and masses; curved spacetimes and gravitation; heavy weak bosons

The $\mathbb{C}^{\wedge 18}$ analogue model contains counterparts to the particle spectrum and interactions of the Standard Model, and has only three tunable parameters. As the structure of this model is highly constrained, predictive relationships between constants may be obtained. In Chapters 4-6, the masses of the tau, the $W$ and $Z$ bosons, and a Higgs-like scalar boson are calculated as functions of $α$, $m_e$, and $m_μ$. They are shown to be $1.776867413(43)$ GeV/$c^2$, $80.3587(22)$ GeV/$c^2$, $91.1877(35)$ GeV/$c^2$, and $125.1261(48)$ GeV/$c^2$ respectively, with no free fitting parameters. All are within $0.1\,σ$ of the observed values of $1.77686(12)$ GeV/$c^2$, $80.360(16)$ GeV/$c^2$, $91.1876(21)$ GeV/$c^2$, and $125.11(11)$ GeV/$c^2$ respectively. In Chapter 7 the final ungauged freedom of the $\mathbb{C}^{\wedge 18}$ model is used to eliminate the right-handed weak interaction, while simultaneously introducing space-time curvature and a gravitational interaction emulating general relativity. The value of Newton's constant is then calculated from $α$, $m_e$, and $m_μ$, yielding $G_N=6.67426(230)\times 10^{-11}~\mathrm{m}^3\mathrm{kg}^{-1}\mathrm{s}^{-2}$, which is in agreement with the observed value of $G_N=6.67430(15)\times 10^{-11}~\mathrm{m}^3\mathrm{kg}^{-1}\mathrm{s}^{-2}$ with tension less than $0.1\,σ_\mathrm{exp}$. This persistent consistency with experiment suggests the existence of a unifying relationship between lepton generations, gravitation, and the electroweak mass scale. In the Classical Analogue to the Standard Model this unification arises from an underlying construction from coloured preons, with the low-energy residuals of the preon binding interactions corresponding to the strong nuclear force.

preprint2024arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.