Paper detail

A Class of $(n, k, r, t)_i$ LRCs Via Parity Check Matrix

A code is called $(n, k, r, t)$ information symbol locally repairable code \big($(n, k, r, t)_i$ LRC\big) if each information coordinate can be achieved by at least $t$ disjoint repair sets, containing at most $r$ other coordinates. This paper considers a class of $(n, k, r, t)_i$ LRCs, where each repair set contains exactly one parity coordinate. We explore the systematic code in terms of the standard parity check matrix. First, some structural features of the parity check matrix are proposed by showing some connections with the membership matrix and the minimum distance optimality of the code. Next to that, parity check matrix based proofs of various bounds associated with the code are placed. In addition to this, we provide several constructions of optimal $(n, k, r, t)_i$ LRCs, with the help of two Cayley tables of a finite field. Finally, we generalize a result of $q$-ary $(n, k, r)$ LRCs to $q$-ary $(n, k, r, t)$ LRCs.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.