Paper detail

A Class of Einstein-Maxwell Fields Generalizing the Equilibrium Solutions

The Einstein-Maxwell fields of rotating stationary sources are represented by the SU(2,1) spinor potential $Ψ_A$ satisfying \[ \nabla \cdot [Θ^{-1}(Ψ_A\nabla Ψ_B-Ψ_B\nabla Ψ_A)]=-2Θ^{-2}\vec{C}\cdot (Ψ_A\nabla Ψ_B-Ψ_B\nabla Ψ_A) \] where $Θ=Ψ^{\dagger }\cdot Ψ$ is the SU(2,1) norm of $Ψ$% . The Ernst potentials are expressed in terms of the spinor potential by $% {\cal E}=\frac{Ψ_1-Ψ_2}{Ψ_1+Ψ_2}$, $Φ=\frac{Ψ_3}{% Ψ_1+Ψ_2}$ . The group invariant vector $\vec{C}=-2i\func{Im}\{Ψ^{\dagger}\cdot \nabla Ψ\}$ is generated exclusively by the rotation of the source, hence it is appropriate to refer to $\vec{C}$ as the {\em swirl} of the field. Static fields have no swirl. The fields with no swirl are a class generalizing the equilibrium ($| e| =m$) class of Einstein-Maxwell fields. We obtain the integrability conditions and a highly symmetrical set of field equations for this class, as well as exact solutions and an open research problem.

preprint2000arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.