Paper detail

A Checklist for the Evaluation of Pedestrian Simulation Software Functionalities

The employment of micro-simulation (agent-based) tools in the phase of design of public and private spaces and facilities and for the definition of transport schemes that impact on pedestrian flows, thanks to their achieved accuracy and predictive capacity, has become a consolidated practice. These instruments provide support to the organization of spaces, services and facilities and to the definition of management procedures for normal and emergency situations. The employment of these tools is effective for various but not for all the contexts, nevertheless new features and functions are under constant development and new products are often launched on the market. Therefore, there is a higher necessity of a standard criteria both for the evaluation of the kinds of function that these software provide, at use of practitioners and end-users, and for the definition of software requirements as a reference for the developers that aim at being competitive on this market. On the basis of our experience as pedestrian modellers and as researchers in the crowd modelling area, we designed a comprehensive and detailed ready-to-use checklist for the quantitative evaluation of Pedestrian Simulation Software functionalities that aims at capturing all the aspects that we claim that are useful to undertake a professional study. These functions in our opinion are necessary to provide accurate results in the planning of new facilities or schemes that involve pedestrian activities. With this work we propose a set of criteria of evaluation for these products also to encourage a debate for the definition of objective standards for pedestrian simulation software certification.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.