Paper detail

A Chebyshev criterion for at most two non-zero limit cycles in Abel equations

In this paper, we investigate the maximum number of limit cycles of the reduced Abel equation $\dot{x}=A(t)x^{3}+B(t)x^{2}$ on an interval $[0,T]$. The Smale-Pugh problem asks whether this maximum number is bounded in terms of a given class of coefficients. We establish for the first time a Chebyshev criterion, providing a positive answer to the problem when this class spanned by an extended Chebyshev system (ET-system) $\mathcal{F}=\{f_{0},f_{1},f_{2}\}$ on $[0,T)$ with $f_{0}\not=0$. As an application, we prove that the equation has at most three limit cycles (including $x=0$) when the coefficients $A$ and $B$ are both linear trigonometric functions or quadratic polynomials. This reestablishes the result of Yu et al. (J. Differ. Equ., 2024) and improves the work of Bravo et al. (Disc. Cont. Dyn. Syst., 2015 \& J. Differ. Equ., 2024). We also obtain the same maximum number of limit cycles for the equation with trinomial coefficients.

preprint2026arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.