Paper detail

A Characterization Theorem and An Algorithm for A Convex Hull Problem

Given $S= \{v_1, \dots, v_n\} \subset \mathbb{R} ^m$ and $p \in \mathbb{R} ^m$, testing if $p \in conv(S)$, the convex hull of $S$, is a fundamental problem in computational geometry and linear programming. First, we prove a Euclidean {\it distance duality}, distinct from classical separation theorems such as Farkas Lemma: $p$ lies in $conv(S)$ if and only if for each $p' \in conv(S)$ there exists a {\it pivot}, $v_j \in S$ satisfying $d(p',v_j) \geq d(p,v_j)$. Equivalently, $p \not \in conv(S)$ if and only if there exists a {\it witness}, $p' \in conv(S)$ whose Voronoi cell relative to $p$ contains $S$. A witness separates $p$ from $conv(S)$ and approximate $d(p, conv(S))$ to within a factor of two. Next, we describe the {\it Triangle Algorithm}: given $ε\in (0,1)$, an {\it iterate}, $p' \in conv(S)$, and $v \in S$, if $d(p, p') < εd(p,v)$, it stops. Otherwise, if there exists a pivot $v_j$, it replace $v$ with $v_j$ and $p'$ with the projection of $p$ onto the line $p'v_j$. Repeating this process, the algorithm terminates in $O(mn \min \{ε^{-2}, c^{-1}\ln ε^{-1} \})$ arithmetic operations, where $c$ is the {\it visibility factor}, a constant satisfying $c \geq ε^2$ and $\sin (\angle pp'v_j) \leq 1/\sqrt{1+c}$, over all iterates $p'$. Additionally, (i) we prove a {\it strict distance duality} and a related minimax theorem, resulting in more effective pivots; (ii) describe $O(mn \ln ε^{-1})$-time algorithms that may compute a witness or a good approximate solution; (iii) prove {\it generalized distance duality} and describe a corresponding generalized Triangle Algorithm; (iv) prove a {\it sensitivity theorem} to analyze the complexity of solving LP feasibility via the Triangle Algorithm. The Triangle Algorithm is practical and competitive with the simplex method, sparse greedy approximation and first-order methods.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.