Paper detail

A Characterization of hard-to-cover CSPs

We continue the study of the covering complexity of constraint satisfaction problems (CSPs) initiated by Guruswami, Håstad and Sudan [SIAM J. Comp. 2002] and Dinur and Kol [CCC'13]. The covering number of a CSP instance $Φ$ is the smallest number of assignments to the variables of $Φ$, such that each constraint of $Φ$ is satisfied by at least one of the assignments. We show the following results: 1. Assuming a covering variant of the Unique Games Conjecture, introduced by Dinur and Kol, we show that for every non-odd predicate $P$ over any constant-size alphabet and every integer $K$, it is NP-hard to approximate the covering number within a factor of $K$. This yields a complete characterization of CSPs over constant-size alphabets that are hard to cover. 2. For a large class of predicates that are contained in the 2k-LIN predicate, we show that it is quasi-NP-hard to distinguish between instances with covering number at most $2$ and those with covering number at least $Ω(\log\log n)$. This generalizes and improves the 4-LIN covering hardness result of Dinur and Kol.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.