Paper detail

A characterization of eventually periodicity

In this article, we show that the Kamae-Xue complexity function for an infinite sequence classifies eventual periodicity completely. We prove that an infinite binary word $x_1x_2 \cdots $ is eventually periodic if and only if $Σ(x_1x_2\cdots x_n)/n^3$ has a positive limit, where $Σ(x_1x_2\cdots x_n)$ is the sum of the squares of all the numbers of appearance of finite words in $x_1 x_2 \cdots x_n$, which was introduced by Kamae-Xue as a criterion of randomness in the sense that $x_1x_2\cdots x_n$ is more random if $Σ(x_1x_2\cdots x_n)$ is smaller. In fact, it is known that the lower limit of $Σ(x_1x_2\cdots x_n) /n^2 $ is at least 3/2 for any sequence $x_1x_2 \cdots$, while the limit exists as 3/2 almost surely for the $(1/2,1/2)$ product measure. For the other extreme, the upper limit of $Σ(x_1x_2\cdots x_n)/n^3$ is bounded by 1/3. There are sequences which are not eventually periodic but the lower limit of $Σ(x_1x_2\cdots x_n)/n^3$ is positive, while the limit does not exist.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.