Paper detail

A characterization of bipartite Leonard pairs using the notion of a tail

Let $V$ denote a vector space with finite positive dimension. We consider an ordered pair of linear transformations $A: V\rightarrow V$ and $A^*: V\rightarrow V$ that satisfy (i) and (ii) below. (i) There exists a basis for $V$ with respect to which the matrix representing $A$ is irreducible tridiagonal and the matrix representing $A^*$ is diagonal. (ii) There exists a basis for $V$ with respect to which the matrix representing $A^*$ is irreducible tridiagonal and the matrix representing $A$ is diagonal. We call such a pair a Leonard pair on $V$. Very roughly speaking, a Leonard pair is a linear algebraic abstraction of a $Q$-polynomial distance-regular graph. There is a well-known class of distance-regular graphs said to be bipartite and there is a related notion of a bipartite Leonard pair. Recently, M. S. Lang introduced the notion of a tail for bipartite distance-regular graphs, and there is an abstract version of this tail notion. Lang characterized the bipartite $Q$-polynomial distance-regular graphs using tails. In this paper, we obtain a similar characterization of the bipartite Leonard pairs using tails. Whereas Lang's arguments relied on the combinatorics of a distance-regular graph, our results are purely algebraic in nature.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.