Paper detail

A Characterization of Approximability for Biased CSPs

A $μ$-biased Max-CSP instance with predicate $ψ:\{0,1\}^r \to \{0,1\}$ is an instance of Constraint Satisfaction Problem (CSP) where the objective is to find a labeling of relative weight at most $μ$ which satisfies the maximum fraction of constraints. Biased CSPs are versatile and express several well studied problems such as Densest-$k$-Sub(Hyper)graph and SmallSetExpansion. In this work, we explore the role played by the bias parameter $μ$ on the approximability of biased CSPs. We show that the approximability of such CSPs can be characterized (up to loss of factors of arity $r$) using the bias-approximation curve of Densest-$k$-SubHypergraph (DkSH). In particular, this gives a tight characterization of predicates which admit approximation guarantees that are independent of the bias parameter $μ$. Motivated by the above, we give new approximation and hardness results for DkSH. In particular, assuming the Small Set Expansion Hypothesis (SSEH), we show that DkSH with arity $r$ and $k = μn$ is NP-hard to approximate to a factor of $Ω(r^3μ^{r-1}\log(1/μ))$ for every $r \geq 2$ and $μ< 2^{-r}$. We also give a $O(μ^{r-1}\log(1/μ))$-approximation algorithm for the same setting. Our upper and lower bounds are tight up to constant factors, when the arity $r$ is a constant, and in particular, imply the first tight approximation bounds for the Densest-$k$-Subgraph problem in the linear bias regime. Furthermore, using the above characterization, our results also imply matching algorithms and hardness for every biased CSP of constant arity.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.