Paper detail

A Centre-Stable Manifold for the Energy-Critical Wave Equation in R^3 in the Symmetric Setting

Consider the focusing semilinear wave equation in R^3 with energy-critical nonlinearity \partial_t^2 ψ- Δψ- ψ^5 = 0, ψ(0) = ψ_0, \partial_t ψ(0) = ψ_1. This equation admits stationary solutions of the form ϕ(x, a) := (3a)^{1/4} (1+a|x|^2)^{-1/2}, called solitons, which solve the elliptic equation -Δϕ- ϕ^5 = 0. Restricting ourselves to the space of symmetric solutions ψfor which ψ(x) = ψ(-x), we find a local centre-stable manifold, in a neighborhood of ϕ(x, 1), for this wave equation in the weighted Sobolev space <x>^{-1} \dot H^1 \times <x>^{-1} L^2. Solutions with initial data on the manifold exist globally in time for t \geq 0, depend continuously on initial data, preserve energy, and can be written as the sum of a rescaled soliton and a dispersive radiation term. The proof is based on a new class of reverse Strichartz estimates, introduced in Beceanu-Goldberg and adapted here to the case of Hamiltonians with a resonance.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.