Paper detail

A Cell-Level Mechanism of Contrast Gain Control

The gain of neurons' responses in the auditory cortex is sensitive to contrast changes in the stimulus within a spectrotemporal range similar to their receptive fields, which can be interpreted to represent the tuning of the input to a neuron. This indicates a local mechanism of contrast gain control, which we explore with a minimal mechanistic model here. Gain control through noisy input has been observed in vitro and in a range of computational models. We investigate the behaviour of the simplest of such models to showcase gain control, a stochastic leaky integrate-and-fire (sLIF) neuron, which exhibits gain control through divisive normalisation of the input both with and without accompanying subtractive shift of the input-response curve, depending on whether input noise is proportional to or independent of its mean. To get a more direct understanding of how the input statistics change the response, we construct an analytic approximation to the firing rate of a sLIF neuron constituted of the expression for the deterministic case and a weighted average over the derived approximate steady-state distribution of conductance due to poissonian synaptic inputs. This analytic approximation qualitatively produces the same behaviour as simulations and could be extended by spectrotemporally tuned inputs to give a simple, physiological and local mechanism of contrast gain control in auditory sensing, building on recent experimental work that has hitherto only been described by phenomenological models. By comparing our weighted average firing rate curve with the commonly used sigmoidal input-response function, we demonstrate a nearly linear relationship between both the horizontal shift (or stimulus inflection point) and the inverse gain of the sigmoid and statistics derived from the sLIF model parameters, thus providing a structural constraint on the sigmoid parameter choice.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.