Paper detail

A Cautionary Tale: Dark Energy in Single-Field, Slow-Roll Inflationary Models

The current epoch of accelerated cosmic expansion is postulated to be driven by dark energy, which in the standard model takes the form of a cosmological constant with equation of state parameter $w=-1$. We propose an innovative perspective over the nature of dark energy by drawing a parallel with inflation, which we assume to be driven by a single scalar field, the inflaton. The inflaton was not a cosmological constant, as indicated by the fact that inflation ended and by the Planck satellite's constraint of $n_s\neq 1$ at $8σ$ confidence. Therefore, it is interesting to verify whether its equation of state parameter was measurably different from $-1$. We analyze this question for a class of single-field slow-roll inflationary models, where the hierarchy of Hubble slow-roll parameters is truncated at different orders. Based on the latest Planck and BICEP2/Keck data, we obtain a $68\%$ upper bound of $1+w < 0.0014$ for the three-parameter model, which gives the best description to the data. This provides a cautionary tale for drawing conclusions about the nature of today's dark energy based upon the non-detection of a deviation from $w=-1$ with current and upcoming cosmological surveys.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.