Paper detail

A catalogue of the voids in the IRAS 1.2-Jy survey

Using the VOID FINDER algorithm we have compiled a catalogue of voids in the IRAS 1.2-Jy sample. The positions of the voids correspond well to underdense regions seen in the IRAS smoothed density map. However, since in our analysis no smoothing is used, all structures appear much sharper: walls are not smeared and the voids are not artificially reduced by them. Therefore the current method based on the galaxy point distribution is better suited to determine the diameter of voids in the galaxy distribution. We have identified 24 voids, covering more than 30% of the volume considered. By comparing the results with equivalent random catalogues we have determined that 12 voids are significant at a 0.95 confidence level, having an average diameter of 40+-6 h^{-1} Mpc. Our results serve not only for charting the cosmography of the nearby Universe, but also to give support to the results recently obtained with the SSRS2 sample, suggesting a void-filled Universe. Moreover, our results indicate that the voids detected have a similar scale, demonstrating that both optically and IRAS-selected galaxies delineate the same large-scale structures.

preprint1997arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.