Paper detail

A canonical torsion theory for pro-p Iwahori-Hecke modules

Let $\mathfrak F$ be a locally compact nonarchimedean field with residue characteristic $p$ and $G$ the group of $\mathfrak{F}$-rational points of a connected split reductive group over $\mathfrak{F}$. We define a torsion pair in the category Mod$(H)$ of modules over the pro-$p$-Iwahori Hecke $k$-algebra $H$ of $G$, where $k$ is an arbitrary field. We prove that, under a certain hypothesis, the torsionfree class embeds fully faithfully into the category Mod${}^I(G)$ of smooth $k$-representations of $G$ generated by their pro-$p$-Iwahori fixed vectors. If the characteristic of $k$ is different from $p$ then this hypothesis is always satisfied and the torsionfree class is the whole category Mod$(H)$. If $k$ contains the residue field of $\mathfrak F$ then we study the case $G = \mathbf{SL_2}(\mathfrak F)$. We show that our hypothesis is satisfied, and we describe explicitly the torsionfree and the torsion classes. If $\mathfrak F\neq \mathbb Q_p$ and $p\neq 2$, then an $H$-module is in the torsion class if and only if it is a union of supersingular finite length submodules; it lies in the torsionfree class if and only if it does not contain any nonzero supersingular finite length module. If $\mathfrak{F} = \mathbb{Q}_p$, the torsionfree class is the whole category Mod$(H)$, and we give a new proof of the fact that Mod$(H)$ is equivalent to Mod${}^I(G)$. These results are based on the computation of the $H$-module structure of certain natural cohomology spaces for the pro-$p$-Iwahori subgroup $I$ of $G$.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.