Paper detail

A calibration framework for high-resolution hydrological models using a multiresolution and heterogeneous strategy

Increasing spatial and temporal resolution of numerical models continues to propel progress in hydrological sciences, but, at the same time, it has strained the ability of modern automatic calibration methods to produce realistic model parameter combinations for these models. This paper presents a new reliable and fast automatic calibration framework to address this issue. In essence, the proposed framework, adopting a divide and conquer strategy, first partitions the parameters into groups of different resolutions based on their sensitivity or importance, in which the most sensitive parameters are prioritized with highest resolution in parameter search space, while the least sensitive ones are explored with the coarsest resolution at beginning. This is followed by an optimization based iterative calibration procedure consisting of a series of sub-tasks or runs. Between consecutive runs, the setup configuration is heterogeneous with parameter search ranges and resolutions varying among groups. At the completion of each sub-task, the parameter ranges within each group are systematically refined from their previously estimated ranges which are initially based on a priori information. Parameters attain stable convergence progressively with each run. A comparison of this new calibration framework with a traditional optimization-based approach was performed using a quasi-synthetic double-model setup experiment to calibrate 134 parameters and two well-known distributed hydrological models: the Variable Infiltration Capacity (VIC) model and the Distributed Hydrology Soil Vegetation Model (DHSVM). The results demonstrate statistically that the proposed framework can better mitigate equifinality problem, yields more realistic model parameter estimates, and is computationally more efficient.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.