Paper detail

A $C^1$-continuous finite element formulation for solving the Jeffery-Hamel boundary value problem

The third-order Jeffery-Hamel ODE governing the flow of an incompressible fluid in a two-dimensional wedge is briefly derived, and a C^1 finite element formulation of the equation is developed. This formulation has several advantages, including a natural framework for enforcing the boundary conditions, a numerically efficient solution procedure, and suitability for implementation within well-established, open, scientific computing tools. The finite element formulation is shown to be non-coercive, and therefore not ideal for proving existence, uniqueness, or a priori error estimates, but the numerical solutions computed with quartic Hermite elements are nevertheless found to converge to reference solutions at nearly optimal rates (O(h^4) in both L^2 and H^1 norms). Further work is required to better understand the cause of the suboptimal convergence rates, and a linear model problem which exhibits analogous characteristics is also discussed as a possible starting point for future theoretical analyses.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.