Paper detail

A Bright Molecular Core in a Crab Nebula Filament

In a sub-arcsec near-infrared survey of the Crab Nebula using the new Spartan Infrared Camera, we have found several knots with high surface brightness in the H_2 2.12 micron line and a very large H_2 2.12 micron to Br-gamma ratio. The brightest of these knots has an intensity ratio I(H_2 2.12 micron)/I(Br-gamma) = 18+/-9, which we show sets a lower limit on the ratio of masses in the molecular and recombination (i.e. ionized) zones M_mol / M_rec >/- 0.9, and a total molecular mass within this single knot M_mol >/- 5E-5 M_sun. We argue that the knot discussed here probably is able to emit so strongly in the 2.12 micron line because its physical conditions are better tuned for such emission than is the case in other filaments. It is unclear whether this knot has an unusually large M_mol / M_rec ratio, or if many other Crab filaments also have similar amounts of molecular gas which is not emitting because the physical conditions are not so well tuned.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.